SHARE
For years, HR teams and HR tech products relied on keyword search so employees could find policies, benefits documents, onboarding guides, and compliance rules. It worked well enough when the UX was a list of results and the user knew the right keywords.
In the world of AI assistants, that is no longer enough.
Employees now ask conversational questions like:
“What is the parental leave policy for full time remote employees?”
“Can I carry over unused PTO, and does it differ by state?"
“How do I expense a home office setup, and what receipts do I need?”
“Am I eligible for the annual bonus if I joined mid year?”
Keyword search is not dead, but it needs a reranker
The good news: you do not need to throw out your existing search stack.
Some teams prefer to keep their current keyword retrieval (BM25, Elasticsearch, OpenSearch) to avoid switching costs. Then they add a reranker to dramatically boost precision, especially for conversational queries. Others, decide to invest in improving the accuracy and latency of the search stack more deeply, and switch the search infra to companies like ZeroEntropy.
A simple pattern:
Keyword or hybrid retrieval pulls the top 50 to 200 candidates quickly.
A reranker reorders those candidates so the top results actually match the user’s intent.
This upgrade is usually the highest ROI change you can make to HR retrieval because it improves quality without requiring reindexing, new infra, or a full semantic rewrite.
What a reranker does
A reranker is a model that reads the query and each candidate document together, then assigns a relevance score and reorders the list.
Instead of asking “does this document contain the same words,” it asks:
does this document answer the question?
is it the right policy section, country addendum, or benefits plan year?
does it match the employee context implied by the question (location, employment type, level, remote status)?
That deep understanding is what keyword and vector search alone often fail to capture.
Why reranking improves everything, not just relevance
A reranker is not just an accuracy add on. It changes the economics of your whole pipeline.
When ranking improves, you need fewer tokens downstream.
The chain reaction:
Fewer tokens: you pass fewer chunks to the LLM because the top K is actually good
Better tokens: the LLM sees the right clauses and authorities instead of near matches
Lower latency: less context in the prompt reduces end to end time
Lower cost: fewer input tokens and fewer retries
Better results: fewer hallucinations, more grounded answers, better user trust
In HRTech, that is the difference between a demo and a product employees, job seekers, and eployers rely on.
Where ZeroEntropy's zerank-2 is uniquely strong
zerank-2 is designed for modern search use cases, where queries are conversational or highly complex, and the system needs to behave consistently across messy, overlapping internal docs and conditions or filters.
It stands out in three ways:
Instruction following
You can steer ranking with short context like definitions, preferences, and constraints.
Example instruction you can attach:
“Prefer the most recent policy version. If there is a state specific addendum, prefer it over the global policy. If the query is about eligibility, prefer docs that contain explicit criteria. Prefer official HR policy over handbook summaries.”
This is extremely useful when multiple documents appear relevant but only one is authoritative for that employee’s context.
Multilingual robustness
If you support global teams, your corpus and queries are not English only.
zerank-2is built for multilingual and code switched queries, so relevance does not collapse outside English.Calibrated signals for safe behavior
In assistant workflows, you need to know when retrieval is weak. Calibrated scores and confidence let you do simple product logic:
if confidence is low, ask a clarifying question instead of answering
if the top two results are close, include both in context
if nothing clears a threshold, expand the candidate set
This directly reduces hallucination risk. Having a clear calibrated score also allows to set thresholds for job matchmaking purposes.
Two concrete use cases that map to most legal products
1. HR chatbot for policy questions
User asks:
“What is the parental leave policy for full time remote employees?”
Keyword search often returns:
the general parental leave policy
the remote work policy
a benefits overview that mentions leave in passing
Reranking fixes this by pushing to the top:
the parental leave policy section that specifies eligibility criteria
any remote employee addendum, if it exists
the most recent version of the policy
Result: top 5 is useful, not top 50.
2. Recruiting and job seeking search with intent
User asks:
“Find roles like senior data scientist, but focused on NLP, remote, with visa sponsorship.”
Retrieval returns many postings that contain similar keywords.
With zerank-2 instruction-following, you can prompt the reranker to understand that it is retrieving against a specific resume and prioritize jobs that much the candidate's criteria and specific query.
How teams integrate it
Most teams keep their existing retrieval system and add zerank-2 as a second stage:
retrieve top N candidates with keyword or hybrid search
rerank top N with zerank-2
send only top K into the LLM or into the UI
This is a drop in upgrade that improves quality immediately.
Conclusion
Enterprise knowledge bases are shifting from keyword boxes to conversational assistants. When questions carry intent, nuance, and constraints, you need semantic understanding plus reranking. Similarly, HRTech workflows like job search and job matchmaking now depend on intent level understanding.
zerank-2 upgrades your current retrieval into an assistant ready stack: higher precision at the top, fewer tokens downstream, lower latency and cost, and answers users can trust.
Explore the solution at ZeroEntropy.dev and bring accuracy to your legal document workflows.
Get started with
RELATED ARTICLES





