SHARE
Learn how RAG powers accurate, context-aware AI applications
Not only are foundation models stuck with static knowledge, but their training makes them produce natural-sounding, varied responses, even when wrong. That’s how we get “hallucinations.” In this article, we’ll explore why foundation models alone can’t guarantee accuracy, how RAG addresses these gaps, and why the most advanced retrieval stacks — including ZeroEntropy’s ze-rank-1 — are at the heart of reliable AI chat, search, and agentic workflows.
Limitations of foundation models
Products built purely on foundation models are powerful, but limited:
Knowledge cutoffs — Once training is finished, a model’s data is frozen. Ask about last week’s earnings report or a new medical device, and you’ll likely get outdated or fabricated details.
Shallow domain coverage — Foundation models spread their capacity across a huge range of topics, but may miss depth in specialized areas, especially where high-quality, labeled datasets are rare.
No access to your private data — Your internal policies, contracts, customer records, or proprietary research aren’t part of public training sets — and shouldn’t be. Without them, models can’t answer company-specific questions.
No citations — Responses are often source-less. Without attribution, users either trust the output blindly or must re-verify, eroding confidence.
Probabilistic output — Because models choose words based on probability distributions, small changes in prompts or settings can yield very different — sometimes wrong — results.
These factors cause hallucinations and inconsistencies, impacting product trust and business value.
What is Retrieval-Augmented Generation?
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) augments an LLM’s broad reasoning ability with authoritative, external context — often proprietary or domain-specific data — to produce more accurate, relevant, and trustworthy results.
The core RAG workflow has four main components:
Ingestion — Load curated, authoritative data (internal docs, manuals, structured datasets) into a retrieval system such as a vector database.
Retrieval — Search for the most relevant chunks based on the user query.
Augmentation — Combine retrieved data with the query to form a rich, context-infused prompt.
Generation — Pass the augmented prompt to the LLM, grounding its output in the retrieved facts.
With ZeroEntropy’s retrieval stack, these steps are powered by state-of-the-art embeddings, hybrid search, and ze-rank-1 reranking, ensuring the most relevant context makes it into the generation stage.
Benefits of RAG
Real-time data access — Incorporate the latest events, inventory, or customer records without retraining.
Domain-specific depth — Search niche datasets, research, or compliance documents.
Trust & transparency — Return results with citations or links to the original source.
Cost-efficiency — Avoid expensive model fine-tuning by enriching prompts with retrieval.
Control & compliance — Keep data private, manage retrieval sources, and apply guardrails.
How does RAG work?
1. Ingestion
Data can be unstructured (PDFs, wikis, chat logs) or structured (CSV, SQL tables). In ZeroEntropy, ingestion involves:
Cleaning & preprocessing the data
Chunking — splitting text into semantically coherent pieces
Creating vector embeddings with zembed-1
Storing them in a retrieval index for fast, semantic search
2. Retrieval
When a user asks a question:
Their query is embedded in a vector
Hybrid search (dense + sparse) finds matches across semantic meaning and exact keywords
ze-rank-1 reranks the results using our zELO scoring system, ensuring the most relevant context appears first (learn about ELO scoring).
3. Augmentation
The retrieved context is inserted alongside the user’s query into a carefully structured prompt, for example:
QUESTION:
<user’s question>
CONTEXT:
<retrieved passages>
Answer the QUESTION using only the CONTEXT. If the answer isn’t in the CONTEXT, say you don’t know.
4. Generation
The LLM uses the augmented prompt to produce a grounded, context-aware answer, dramatically reducing hallucinations.
Agentic RAG: The Next Evolution
Traditional RAG is a one-shot process. Agentic RAG — supported by ZeroEntropy’s API — allows an AI agent to:
Reformulate or expand queries
Choose the best retrieval tools
Validate and cross-check retrieved data
Iterate until it finds a reliable context
This is essential for complex workflows like legal research, diagnostics, or technical support.
Wrapping up
RAG has moved from a buzzword to a must-have architecture for accurate AI. By combining the reasoning power of LLMs with your authoritative data, it delivers results that are relevant, verifiable, and trustworthy. With ZeroEntropy’s modern retrieval stack — including ze-rank-1, zembed-1, and hybrid search — you can deploy production-grade RAG pipelines that handle millions of documents and scale to millions of queries with confidence. The real question in 2025 isn’t “Should I use RAG?” — it’s “How can I design the most effective RAG architecture for my data and workflows?”
Want to build your RAG pipeline with ZeroEntropy?
Get started with
RELATED ARTICLES
